Learn how LaMonaca Law’s new Strategic Planning program can revolutionize your family law matter.Read More
Learn how LaMonaca Law’s new Strategic Planning program can revolutionize your family law matter.Read More

Surrogacy Contracts in Pennsylvania

Recently the Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld the lower court’s ruling in the case of Baby S., the child conceived by Lamar Sally and celebrity Sherri Shepherd with a gestational carrier. Shepherd has since appealed the case to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

The legal issues surrounding the parentage of Lamar Sally, Jr. (Baby S.) was a matter of first impression for the Pennsylvania Superior Court. Prior case law in Pennsylvania had addressed a gestational carrier’s standing to seek custody of a baby pursuant to a surrogacy contract. In the case of J.F. v. D.B, 897 A.2d 1261 (Pa. Super. 2006), the Superior Court declined to comment on the validity of surrogacy contracts but held that the gestational carrier did not have standing to seek termination of parental rights or custody of the children. In Shepherd’s case, the baby was conceived with the sperm of Sally and the egg of a donor pursuant to a surrogacy contract. During the surrogate’s pregnancy, Sally and Shepherd separated and began divorce proceedings. When the child was born, Shepherd refused to follow through with the gestational carrier contract. She further refused to take any financial or custodial responsibility for the child. Instead, the surrogate was listed as the mother of the new born and informed that she could be responsible for Sally’s claim in California for child support.

Shepherd argued that the only way for her to be placed on the birth certificate and be legally identified as the child’s mother was by genetic birth or adoption. This argument was rejected by the Superior Court and the lower court’s ruling was affirmed. The gestational carrier contract was entered into freely by all parties and Shepherd was bound to comply with the agreement. Further, there are administrative procedures allowing for the issuance of birth certificates in these situations instituted by the Department of Health.

This case is important with respect to solidifying the ever-developing law on gestational carrier contracts. If you need assistance with this area of the law, click or call 610-892-3877.

LaMonaca12_14

About the author

Picture of Melissa Towsey

Melissa Towsey

Melissa graduated from the University of Virginia in 2002 with a double major in Sociology and Foreign Affairs. After working for several years as a paralegal in Washington, D.C., she attended The University of Villanova School of Law and graduated in 2010. During law school, Melissa was involved in several public interest organizations and published an article in Villanova’s Environmental Law Journal, “Something Stinks: The Need for Environmental Regulation of Puppy Mills” 21 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 159 (2010) http://www.animallaw.info/articles/arus21villenvtllj159.htm. After law school, Melissa clerked for the Honorable Thomas G. Parisi, Administrative Judge of the Criminal Division in the Court of Common Pleas, Berks County. Melissa is the supervising attorney of the firm’s Appellate Unit. The Appellate Unit handles all aspects of the appellate process for family law cases as well as advanced research within the firm. Melissa and her husband, Paul, reside in Montgomery County with their two cats Wembley and Gobo. In her spare time, she enjoys audiobooks, barbeques, and watching action movies.

FEATURED VIDEO

SCHEDULE YOUR CONSULTATION

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

SUBSCRIBE NOW AND
STAY UPDATED ON NEW
PRODUCT RELEASES & SPECIAL OFFERS.

CATEGORIES

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS